Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release/9.0-staging] Update dependencies from dotnet/roslyn-analyzers #109303

Conversation

dotnet-maestro[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@dotnet-maestro dotnet-maestro bot commented Oct 28, 2024

This pull request updates the following dependencies

From https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn-analyzers

  • Subscription: 85dd9958-87d4-4ed4-addf-58b6aa848692
  • Build: 20241124.2
  • Date Produced: November 24, 2024 8:58:11 AM UTC
  • Commit: 3d61c57c73c3dd5f1f407ef9cd3414d94bf0eaf2
  • Branch: refs/heads/release/9.0.1xx

…uild 20241027.2

Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzers , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.NetAnalyzers
 From Version 3.11.0-beta1.24508.2 -> To Version 3.11.0-beta1.24527.2
@dotnet-issue-labeler dotnet-issue-labeler bot added the area-codeflow for labeling automated codeflow label Oct 28, 2024
@carlossanlop carlossanlop added the Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release label Oct 28, 2024
…uild 20241124.2

Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzers , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.NetAnalyzers
 From Version 3.11.0-beta1.24508.2 -> To Version 3.11.0-beta1.24574.2
@carlossanlop
Copy link
Member

/ba-g All failures are known

@carlossanlop carlossanlop merged commit 1bc1256 into release/9.0-staging Dec 3, 2024
158 of 161 checks passed
@carlossanlop carlossanlop deleted the darc-release/9.0-staging-ed3ace2d-72cc-4cb4-9b2d-6efb0cc3b3da branch December 3, 2024 18:45
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 3, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
area-codeflow for labeling automated codeflow Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant