Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

JSON/Sqlite: use -> and ->> where possible when traversing JSON, rather than json_extract #30334

Closed
maumar opened this issue Feb 24, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #30745
Closed
Assignees
Labels
area-json area-sqlite closed-fixed The issue has been fixed and is/will be included in the release indicated by the issue milestone. type-enhancement
Milestone

Comments

@maumar
Copy link
Contributor

maumar commented Feb 24, 2023

We use json_extract function to access parts of JSON, but we could/should use -> and ->>

@AndriySvyryd
Copy link
Member

Related to #30724

@roji
Copy link
Member

roji commented Apr 22, 2023

@maumar looked at this while working on #30724, so poaching... Hope that's ok.

@roji roji assigned roji and unassigned maumar Apr 22, 2023
roji added a commit to roji/efcore that referenced this issue Apr 23, 2023
@roji roji added the closed-fixed The issue has been fixed and is/will be included in the release indicated by the issue milestone. label Apr 23, 2023
@roji roji modified the milestones: Backlog, 8.0.0 Apr 23, 2023
roji added a commit to roji/efcore that referenced this issue Apr 23, 2023
roji added a commit to roji/efcore that referenced this issue Apr 25, 2023
@ajcvickers ajcvickers modified the milestones: 8.0.0, 8.0.0-preview4 Apr 25, 2023
@ajcvickers ajcvickers modified the milestones: 8.0.0-preview4, 8.0.0 Nov 14, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area-json area-sqlite closed-fixed The issue has been fixed and is/will be included in the release indicated by the issue milestone. type-enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants