Add generated element constructors

[srujzs]

For every tag that the interface supports, emits a Dart constructor that can be used to create an element of that tag using either createElement or createElementNS. Adds a dependency to @webref/elements to fetch the element data. Modifies existing helper deprecation messages to point to the new constructors instead. Deprecates createAudioElement.

As we remove some members that don't work, and this deprecation is a breaking change, we update the major version number.

[srujzs]

FYI @kevmoo - This requires moving to 0.6.X.

[kevmoo]

Yeah, let's avoid a major bump that makes everybody else have to do another roll of packages.

…

On Fri, Feb 23, 2024, 16:21 Srujan Gaddam ***@***.***> wrote: ***@***.**** commented on this pull request. ------------------------------ In CHANGELOG.md <#185 (comment)>: > @@ -1,6 +1,10 @@ -## 0.5.1-wip +## 0.6.0-wip The language is a bit vague here, but we may be able to get away without rolling a breaking change since these members were already broken: https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/blob/main/docs/process/breaking-changes.md#dart-compatibility-and-philosophy . Implementation bugs: If the implementation deviates unintentionally from the specification, programs may break as we rectify the implementation. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#185 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAEFCQBR65MAX3P4T3XHU3YVEXBFAVCNFSM6AAAAABDXPLYTCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43YUDVNRWFEZLROVSXG5CSMV3GSZLXHMYTQOJZGEZDGOJVGY> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[devoncarew]

@srujzs - I didn't do the create-a-PR-against-a-PR thing, but you might want the last two file changes from srujzs@153424a.

[srujzs]

I didn't do the create-a-PR-against-a-PR thing, but you might want the last two file changes from srujzs@153424a.

Thanks Devon! Unfortunately, it's a little annoying to determine what article is correct even ignoring proper nouns, because words like user and hour defy the vowel rule. For now, I just added a method to only handle the expected inputs. A more general solution is going to be harder: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4558437/programmatically-determine-whether-to-describe-an-object-with-a-or-an.

I also got rid of the wrapping method I added and used the one you added with no changes to the output.

[sigmundch]

Finally finished taking a look! LGTM too :)