Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: bump package.json and format changelog for release 13.6.4 #28825

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 30, 2024

Conversation

AtofStryker
Copy link
Contributor

  • Closes N/A

Additional details

Bumps package.json and preps the CHANGELOG.md for release

Steps to test

How has the user experience changed?

PR Tasks

**Bugfixes:**

- Fixed an issue with capturing assets for Test Replay when service workers are registered in Cypress support files. This issue would cause styles to not render properly in Test Replay. Fixes [#28747](https://github.com/cypress-io/cypress/issues/28747).

**Misc:**
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We typically miss these but looks like @cypress/webpack-dev-server had a release which means we will have a dep bump in the binary as well. see f21b4a1

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should we log that dep bump in the changelog here?

Copy link

cypress bot commented Jan 30, 2024

37 flaky tests on run #53792 ↗︎

0 28974 1343 0 Flakiness 37

Details:

chore: bump package.json and format changelog for release 13.6.4
Project: cypress Commit: 291aeeea43
Status: Passed Duration: 21:32 💡
Started: Jan 30, 2024 2:02 PM Ended: Jan 30, 2024 2:24 PM
Flakiness  e2e/origin/origin.cy.ts • 1 flaky test • 5x-driver-firefox

View Output

Test Artifacts
cy.origin > withBeforeEach > passes runnable state to the secondary origin on retry
    </td>
  </tr></table>
Flakiness  cypress/cypress.cy.js • 3 flaky tests • 5x-driver-firefox

View Output

Test Artifacts
... > correctly returns currentRetry
    </td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td colspan="2">
      <a href="https://cloud.cypress.io/projects/ypt4pf/runs/53792/overview/ebfe86cf-207a-4187-881c-74026cdff0a4?reviewViewBy=FLAKY&utm_source=github&utm_medium=flaky&utm_campaign=view%20test">
        ... > correctly returns currentRetry
      </a>
    </td>
    <td>
      
    </td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td colspan="2">
      <a href="https://cloud.cypress.io/projects/ypt4pf/runs/53792/overview/9fb67b5b-bfaf-4844-a0f8-89960e32d656?reviewViewBy=FLAKY&utm_source=github&utm_medium=flaky&utm_campaign=view%20test">
        ... > correctly returns currentRetry
      </a>
    </td>
    <td>
      
    </td>
  </tr></table>
Flakiness  commands/net_stubbing.cy.ts • 1 flaky test • 5x-driver-electron

View Output

Test Artifacts
network stubbing > waiting and aliasing > yields the expected interception when two requests are raced Test Replay
Flakiness  e2e/origin/origin.cy.ts • 1 flaky test • 5x-driver-electron

View Output

Test Artifacts
cy.origin > withBeforeEach > passes runnable state to the secondary origin on retry Test Replay
Flakiness  cypress/cypress.cy.js • 3 flaky tests • 5x-driver-electron

View Output

Test Artifacts
... > correctly returns currentRetry Test Replay
... > correctly returns currentRetry Test Replay
... > correctly returns currentRetry Test Replay

The first 5 flaky specs are shown, see all 22 specs in Cypress Cloud.

Review all test suite changes for PR #28825 ↗︎

@AtofStryker AtofStryker merged commit f705980 into develop Jan 30, 2024
82 of 84 checks passed
@AtofStryker AtofStryker deleted the chore/release_13_6_4 branch January 30, 2024 14:27
@cypress-bot
Copy link
Contributor

cypress-bot bot commented Jan 30, 2024

Released in 13.6.4.

This comment thread has been locked. If you are still experiencing this issue after upgrading to
Cypress v13.6.4, please open a new issue.

@cypress-bot cypress-bot bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 30, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants