Fix "lambda method requires a literal block" error (Ruby 3.3) #2141
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Running the test suite on Ruby 3.2 produces this validation warning: ``` $ RUBYOPT=-W bundle e rspec spec/lib/capistrano/configuration_spec.rb ... warning: lambda without a literal block is deprecated; use the proc without lambda instead ``` On Ruby 3.3 (head), it crashes because the deprecation is now an error[^1]: ``` ArgumentError: the lambda method requires a literal block ``` This commit fixes the problem by replacing `lambda` with `proc`, as instructed in the deprecation warning. [^1]: https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19777
Generated by 🚫 Danger |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Running the test suite on Ruby 3.2 produces this validation warning:
On Ruby 3.3 (head), it crashes because the deprecation is now an error1:
This commit fixes the problem by replacing
lambdawithproc, as instructed in the deprecation warning.Footnotes
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19777 ↩