winch: Enable memory64 in Winch
#8194
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Closes: bytecodealliance#8089 This commit unlocks support for the `memory64` proposal in Winch. After all the fixes to heap handling, all the spec and misc tests are passing, which is a good indication regarding the support for this proposal. I'll like to merge this change after: bytecodealliance#8156.
saulecabrera
requested review from
elliottt and
fitzgen
and removed request for
a team
github-actions
bot
added
fuzzing
Subscribe to Label Action
This issue or pull request has been labeled: "fuzzing", "winch"
Thus the following users have been cc'd because of the following labels:
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this label, edit the |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes: #8089
This commit unlocks support for the
memory64proposal in Winch. After all the fixes to heap handling, all the spec and misc tests are passing, which is a good indication regarding the support for this proposal.I'll like to merge this change after: #8156.