Add support for new record types (cont.)

[antoniusanggito]

Description

• Source branch in your fork has meaningful name (not main)

Fixes #2062
Continuing from pull request #2099

Before Merge Checklist

These items can be completed after PR is created.

(Check any items that are not applicable (NA) for this PR)

• JavaScript implementation
• Python implementation (NA if HTML beautifier)
• Added Tests to data file(s)
• [NA] Added command-line option(s) (NA if
• [NA] README.md documents new feature/option(s)

[bitwiseman]

You might do better If you changed the tokenizer to recognize #{ as a START_BLOCK token the same as {. I don't know of any case where we would want to separate #{ wheb the user enters them together.

If #{ occurs at a point where the record syntax would not be valid, I think we still want to treat it as though it were valid to avoid bad behavior. We already do something like this for object syntax - If we see { with an identifier followed by : we treat it as an object even if that isn't valid syntax at that point in the code.

[antoniusanggito]

The checklists are done now. Let me know for any updates from your review @bitwiseman.

Sorry for a bit messy history while I was trying to rename the commit message.

[antoniusanggito]

The make commands are passed on my end now

[bitwiseman]

Delete the .DS_store file, please.

[antoniusanggito]

Done, brought it back.. it was deleted accidentally

[bitwiseman]

Well done! Thanks!