Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency babel-plugin-polyfill-corejs3 to ^0.11.0 #17097

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 1, 2025

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jan 29, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
babel-plugin-polyfill-corejs3 (source) ^0.10.6 -> ^0.11.0 age adoption passing confidence

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.


Release Notes

babel/babel-polyfills (babel-plugin-polyfill-corejs3)

v0.11.1

Compare Source

v0.11.0

Compare Source


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Verified

This commit was created on GitHub.com and signed with GitHub’s verified signature.
Copy link
Contributor Author

renovate bot commented Jan 29, 2025

⚠️ Artifact update problem

Renovate failed to update artifacts related to this branch. You probably do not want to merge this PR as-is.

♻ Renovate will retry this branch, including artifacts, only when one of the following happens:

  • any of the package files in this branch needs updating, or
  • the branch becomes conflicted, or
  • you click the rebase/retry checkbox if found above, or
  • you rename this PR's title to start with "rebase!" to trigger it manually

The artifact failure details are included below:

File name: packages/babel-preset-env/package.json
Post-upgrade command 'make' has not been added to the allowed list in allowedPostUpgradeCommands
File name: packages/babel-plugin-transform-runtime/package.json
Post-upgrade command 'make' has not been added to the allowed list in allowedPostUpgradeCommands
File name: packages/babel-plugin-transform-json-modules/package.json
Post-upgrade command 'make' has not been added to the allowed list in allowedPostUpgradeCommands
File name: packages/babel-plugin-transform-async-generator-functions/package.json
Post-upgrade command 'make' has not been added to the allowed list in allowedPostUpgradeCommands

@babel-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

babel-bot commented Jan 29, 2025

Build successful! You can test your changes in the REPL here: https://babeljs.io/repl/build/58646

Copy link
Contributor Author

renovate bot commented Jan 29, 2025

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

⚠️ Warning: custom changes will be lost.

Verified

This commit was signed with the committer’s verified signature.
nicolo-ribaudo Nicolò Ribaudo
@nicolo-ribaudo nicolo-ribaudo force-pushed the renovate/babel-plugin-polyfill-corejs3-0.x branch from 7b46529 to 85d25db Compare January 29, 2025 17:59
@nicolo-ribaudo nicolo-ribaudo merged commit 1137c29 into main Feb 1, 2025
92 checks passed
@nicolo-ribaudo nicolo-ribaudo deleted the renovate/babel-plugin-polyfill-corejs3-0.x branch February 1, 2025 16:35
@nicolo-ribaudo
Copy link
Member

nicolo-ribaudo commented Feb 11, 2025

You are right, do you want to open a PR updating it? :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants