fix(ecs): stack name can result in noncompliant capacity provider name

[msambol]

Closes #29151.

---

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license

[aws-cdk-automation]

The pull request linter has failed. See the aws-cdk-automation comment below for failure reasons. If you believe this pull request should receive an exemption, please comment and provide a justification.

A comment requesting an exemption should contain the text Exemption Request. Additionally, if clarification is needed add Clarification Request to a comment.

[msambol]

Exemption Request: There is already an integration test for capacity provider. The unit test should suffice here.

[gracelu0]

can we update the description for capacityProviderName here to include the added format with cp- prefix?

✅ Updated pull request passes all PRLinter validations. Dismissing previous PRLinter review.

[msambol]

can we update the description for capacityProviderName here to include the added format with cp- prefix?

I added a note for this. 👍🏼

[gracelu0]

LGTM, thanks for contributing!

[mergify]

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

[aws-cdk-automation]

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

• CodeBuild project: AutoBuildv2Project1C6BFA3F-wQm2hXv2jqQv
• Commit ID: 602a74a
• Result: SUCCEEDED
• Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

[mergify]

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).