-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Always use __dict__ and ignore __slots__ on classes #169
Conversation
The workflow failure seems unrelated to my modification. |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #169 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 89.83% 89.88% +0.05%
==========================================
Files 27 27
Lines 1141 1137 -4
==========================================
- Hits 1025 1022 -3
+ Misses 116 115 -1
📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
This is related though.
I'll have to ping @eteq , @jairideout , and @pkgw based on the blame on the affected function. |
RTD failure is indeed unrelated. I don't know why it is pulling such old versions. |
I fixed this, but there was another error :
Yeah, I guess the added complexity was there for a reason ? But if |
@Nodd , unfortunately I wasn't involved in the original design of the code, so I have no idea what it is trying to do, but hopefully one of the contributors could comment more. 🤞 I Thanks for your contribution and for your patience! |
Looks like the rebase went well! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This could use a regression test, could you add the one you reported in #168?
Also, will need a changelog entry.
OK, I'll do this as soon as I can find some time. |
I ran into this problem as well when attempting to automodapi a module containing some classes that extend pydantic's BaseModel which uses @Nodd can cherry pick the commit with the tests, or I can create a new PR. No preference on my end. |
Thanks for your interested in this PR! Since it has been 6 months, if a new PR could be made with cherry picking the original commits here + new stuff needed to push it over the finish line, that would be great! 🙇♀️ |
Sorry, I never found the time to finish this. @kylefawcett you can create a new PR, I'll be very happy if you manage to get it done 😃 |
Thanks, all! Superseded by #181 |
Updated "Use __dict__ and ignore __slots__ on classes #169
Fix #168