Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Error to process server push response #11654

Closed
purgeyao opened this issue Jan 15, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #11661
Closed

Error to process server push response #11654

purgeyao opened this issue Jan 15, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #11661

Comments

@purgeyao
Copy link

Describe the bug
客户端异常
Two client startup exceptions are reported

ERROR [,,,] 66919 --- [229.76.212-2340] c.a.n.c.remote.client.grpc.GrpcClient    : [1705300626632_39.164.140.146_55207]Error to process server push response: {"headers":{},"abilityTable":{"supportPersistentInstanceByGrpc":true},"module":"internal"}

Expected behavior
客户端异常
Two client startup exceptions are reported

Actually behavior
报错原因?
Cause of error?

How to Reproduce

Desktop (please complete the following information):

  • OS: [e.g. Centos]
  • Version [e.g. nacos-server 2.3.0, nacos-client 2.1.0]
  • Module [e.g. naming/config]
  • SDK [e.g. original, spring-cloud-alibaba-nacos,spring-cloud]

Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.

@purgeyao
Copy link
Author

purgeyao commented Jan 15, 2024

启动客户端报的错,仅使用配置或调用,只会有一行报错,如两个功能都使用就会有两行报错,客户端服务正常启动。
If an error is reported when the client is started, only the configuration or invocation is used. If two functions are used, two lines will be reported, and the client service starts normally。
@chuntaojun

@Daydreamer-ia
Copy link
Contributor

这个错误可以忽略。在V2.3.0版本支持能力协商,会在建立连接的时候把服务端的能力表和客户端能力表发送给对端。客户端也是在V2.3.0版本才做能力协商支持,更早的版本客户端没有支持。不会原有的业务流程有任何影响。#8458

This error can be ignored, to be honest. The nacos-server V2.3.0 support ability negotiation. It will send its features it supports when they set up connection. The client begin to support ability negotiation from V2.3.0 too. The previous version do not support. Nothing wrong will happen by it. #8458

@Daydreamer-ia
Copy link
Contributor

i will resolve it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
3 participants