New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Combined usage with actions/labeler #57
Comments
👋 hi @jenssimon. Thanks for sharing your feedback and question. I haven't used https://github.com/actions/labeler yet. I'm curious, why do you need the monorepo labeler and https://github.com/actions/labeler? Can https://github.com/actions/labeler also label the monorepos? |
Hi @adamzolyak, The answer is pretty easy.
|
I don't see an easy way to use That's the reason why I use this action in combination with It's an action provided by GitHub. Maybe it's a great addition adding "monorepo labeling" to it. Only had a quick look on issues and PRs and haven't seen this topic there. |
@jenssimon Not sure if you have since solved this problem but I suspect your use of |
@kyhule You might be right. I see some activity regarding Haven't heard any complaints about missing labels for quite some time. The projects running on this setup are using the recent versions of the actions. I will check and ask the team. |
I tested this theory with labeler running it before the monorepo labeler with |
Seems my described problems are gone since So combined usage is as described in the PR description. But with: steps:
- - uses: actions/labeler@v4
+ - uses: actions/labeler@v5 # or beyond
with: |
Are there recommendations how to use this action combined with
actions/labeler
?Question
Sometimes this configuration leads to moments like
I think
pull_request
andpull_request_target
- no difference between workflow execution for both eventsI haven't checked yet if it makes sense to run both actions within the same workflow.
Example code
Currently I run this configuration for a project using a monorepo:
So I can label changes for a PR on
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: