From f27da3bc5dbab4b9d3886ff8584f777abb1b4c73 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Antonio Aversa <antonio.aversa@sonarsource.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 18:00:29 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Code review 3

---
 ...ouldBePrivateAndReadonly.CSharp9.TopLevelStatements.cs | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/analyzers/tests/SonarAnalyzer.UnitTest/TestCases/LockedFieldShouldBePrivateAndReadonly.CSharp9.TopLevelStatements.cs b/analyzers/tests/SonarAnalyzer.UnitTest/TestCases/LockedFieldShouldBePrivateAndReadonly.CSharp9.TopLevelStatements.cs
index 3fcd5a91737..a31ca9aa2f6 100644
--- a/analyzers/tests/SonarAnalyzer.UnitTest/TestCases/LockedFieldShouldBePrivateAndReadonly.CSharp9.TopLevelStatements.cs
+++ b/analyzers/tests/SonarAnalyzer.UnitTest/TestCases/LockedFieldShouldBePrivateAndReadonly.CSharp9.TopLevelStatements.cs
@@ -2,9 +2,17 @@
 //    ^^^^^^^^^^
 lock (MethodReturningString()) { } // Noncompliant
 lock (new object()) { }            // Noncompliant
+lock (staticReadonlyField) { }
+lock (staticReadWriteField) {}     // Noncompliant
 
 string MethodReturningString() => "a string";
 
+partial class Program
+{
+    static readonly object staticReadonlyField = new();
+    static object staticReadWriteField = new();
+}
+
 class ClassNestedAtTopLevel
 {
     readonly object readonlyField = new();