chore: Bump version to 2.2.0

[codeofdusk]

Details

This PR increments the minor version, bringing us to v2.2.0.

Motivation

Upcoming release

Pull request checklist

• [n/a] Addresses an existing issue: #0000

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #952 (d4145ee) into main (4fc19c3) will increase coverage by 1.12%.
Report is 332 commits behind head on main.
The diff coverage is 79.02%.

❗ Current head d4145ee differs from pull request most recent head 9398c7c. Consider uploading reports for the commit 9398c7c to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #952      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   73.70%   74.82%   +1.12%     
==========================================
  Files         398      423      +25     
  Lines       12046    13093    +1047     
==========================================
+ Hits         8878     9797     +919     
- Misses       3168     3296     +128     

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
src/Actions/Actions/ControlPatternAction.cs	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/Actions/Actions/CustomUIAAction.cs	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/Actions/Actions/ListenAction.cs	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/Actions/Actions/PrivacyExtensions.cs	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/Actions/Actions/SetDataAction.cs	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...rc/Actions/Attributes/InteractionLevelAttribute.cs	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/Actions/Misc/ExtensionMethods.cs	7.46% <0.00%> (-31.60%)	⬇️
src/Actions/Resources/ErrorMessages.Designer.cs	0.00% <ø> (-55.56%)	⬇️
src/Automation/AxeWindowsAutomationException.cs	33.33% <ø> (-33.34%)	⬇️
src/Automation/Data/OutputFile.cs	88.88% <ø> (ø)
... and 144 more

... and 241 files with indirect coverage changes

[DaveTryon]

Not sure why this would be a minor version change... we've made a bug fix in a backward compatible way, which is the literal definition of a patch release from https://semver.org/#summary

[codeofdusk]

@DaveTryon We've also "added functionality in a backward compatible way" in #948, but I'm happy to abandon this PR if you think a minor version bump would be inappropriate here.

[DaveTryon]

I'd forgotten about #948, which adds new functionality. Minor version bump seems justified.