Define a pretty printer for enums #3561
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
JensHeinrich
pushed a commit
to JensHeinrich/hypothesis
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 16, 2023
…r/pretty-print-enums Define a pretty printer for enums
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Enums are currently pretty-printed with their raw repr rather than a useful identifier than can be used in code.
This pull request updates the pretty printing code to fix that, so that where previously an enum member would be printed as e.g.
<AnEnum.SOME_MEMBER: 1>, it is now printed asAnEnum.SOME_MEMBER.