Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Issues in PEAR repository and after it, detach the fork from upstream to have main code #1

Open
Neustradamus opened this issue Jan 5, 2024 · 12 comments

Comments

@Neustradamus
Copy link

Dear @pear team, @jparise, and current contributors: @ashnazg, @CloCkWeRX, @troymccabe, @kenguest, @cweiske, @mj, @till, @Jehan,

In first, I wish you a Happy New Year 2024!

It is possible to add "Issues" section into the pear source repository?

Can you detach the upstream repository from the original place: https://github.com/CloCkWeRX/XML_Parser2?

The goal is to have the main source code in PEAR organization like, for example:

Thanks in advance.

PS: If @CloCkWeRX removes this repository, it will be directly good about the second part.

@ashnazg
Copy link

ashnazg commented Jan 7, 2024

I've made the request to have this pear repo detached from @CloCkWeRX 's repo, which will make the pear repo the top parent.

@ashnazg
Copy link

ashnazg commented Jan 7, 2024

I've also added Issues here.

@Neustradamus
Copy link
Author

@ashnazg: Thanks a lot!
Can you do the same request for https://github.com/pear/Auth_SASL2?

@ashnazg
Copy link

ashnazg commented Jan 7, 2024

Submitted the fork detachment request for Auth_SASL2 too.

@till
Copy link

till commented Jan 8, 2024

What's the nature of these requests?

@till
Copy link

till commented Jan 8, 2024

@ashnazg I think that "guy" is some kind of bot.

He's been pestering me about fixing something in some code I archived for months.

If you look at his socials, that's all he does. Except for reposting rss feeds.

@Neustradamus
Copy link
Author

@till: I am not a bot...

You have archived your repository because I have requested to add "Issues" section...

@till
Copy link

till commented Jan 8, 2024

@till: I am not a bot...

You have archived your repository because I have requested to add "Issues" section...

As I explained to you before, I have archived it because it's a service wrapper for a web service that no longer exists.

It does not make sense to address your nitpicks in code that cannot be used anymore.

We do open source in our spare time and your nagging is not helpful nor does it motivate anybody. Especially when it doesn't address any issues.

Please acknowledge that you understand.

@Neustradamus
Copy link
Author

Good news, two have been detached :)

Thanks @ashnazg!

@till: No problem about the service is no longer exists.
But it is possible to detach to have the main place here, and archived after?

@till
Copy link

till commented Jan 8, 2024

@till: No problem about the service is no longer exists.

But it is possible to detach to have the main place here, and archived after?

Again, what is the significance?

@Neustradamus
Copy link
Author

@till: The main code in PEAR and after in personal repository, not inversed.

@ashnazg: Can you look? (It is easy to do for):

There is a v1 and v2 on PEAR (like for example Auth_SASL/Auth_SASL2) but it is attached:

After, it is needed to check an update from upstream for:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants